FENS Forum 2018: The European Journal of Neuroscience (EJN) Publishing Workshop
12 July 2018
FENS News
12 July, 2018 in FENS News
Topics covered by the EJN workshop included:
1. How a paper is handled once submitted to a journal
2. What happens to your paper?
3. The ‘peer-review’ system
4. What the Editors do
5. What the Reviewers do
6. Exercise: Looking at ‘good’ and ‘bad’ reviews
7. How to respond to Reviewers’ comments
8. Ethics of publishing (human subjects, animals, plagiarism)
9. What we expect in a good paper
10. Exercise: Looking at ‘good’ and ‘bad’ abstracts
This special interest event is jointly organised by the European Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroscience.
Presentations are available here:
-
What happens to your paper when submitted to a journal?
Paul Bolam, Editor-in-Chief, The European Journal of Neuroscience - What Goes Into a Good Paper: An Editor’s Perspective
Dr. Eric Prager, Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Neuroscience Research
- The Peer Review Process
Juan Lerma, Editor-in-Chief, Neuroscience
- Reproducibility, transparent reviews, & the myth of the impact factor
John Foxe, Editor-in-Chief, The European Journal of Neuroscience