FENS and SfN statement in strong support of Prof. Logothetis

The value of research for wide-reaching scientific and medical advances, including the experiments carried out at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (MPIK), cannot be overstated. Animal research is of course an emotive topic, however, scientists should be able to depend upon support from their institutes when faced with unfounded attacks from animal rights organisations and public smearing, as in the case of Professor Logothetis.

We are aware that Professor Logothetis has been accused of wrongdoing in his animal research and that some issues may remain under investigation. Nevertheless, Professor Logothetis has been exonerated of the majority of the accusations that he initially faced. Even if minor issues remain to be investigated, it is wrong that he is assumed to be guilty by the Max Planck Society even before he has had a chance to defend himself and that he remains tarnished by the earlier allegations that have proven false.

The treatment of Professor Logothetis and his colleagues by the Max Planck Society sets an alarming precedent whereby institutions neglect to support affiliated scientists facing similar unproven accusations and disregard the presumption of innocence. Moreover, the recent cancellation of the Scientific Advisory Board’s visit to the Institute – a key element of the institute’s usual transparent scientific review process – denies Professor Logothetis and his colleagues the possibility to explain and defend their research. The withholding of such a review from scientists who have not faced allegations seems particularly unfair.

The scientific community looks to bodies such as the Max Plank Society for leadership and clarity. In addition to letters addressed directly to the Max Planck Society, SfN and FENS hereby reiterate their call on the Max Planck Society to rectify their unfair treatment of Professor Logothetis. Moreover, the society should reinstate the aforementioned scientific review procedure, which is fundamental for the research performed at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics. Furthermore, we call upon all research institutions to develop mechanisms that will guarantee support for their affiliated scientists when targeted in a similar way by animal activists.

Download the full statement

References

1. Max Planck scientists criticize handling of animal-rights charges against leading neuroscientist, A. Abbott, Nature, 30th May 2018 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05187-w

2. Max Planck Society’s actions raise serious concerns about leadership and the future of German neuroscience, Speaking of Research, 7th June 2018 https://speakingofresearch.com/2018/06/07/max-planck-societys-actions-raise-serious- concerns-about-leadership-and-the-future-of-german-neuroscience/

3. Open Letter Regarding the Max Planck Society’s Actions Against MPI-BC Director Prof. Logothetis, Speaking of Research, 25th July 2018 https://speakingofresearch.com/2018/07/25/open-letter-regarding-the-max-planck- societys-actions-against-mpi-bc-director-prof-logothetis/